<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Scuba Diving Magazine - Stephen Frink</title>
    <link>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/</link>
    <description />
    <copyright>F+W Publications, Inc.</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:15:04 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 1.8.5223.2</generator>
    <managingEditor>scuba@krause.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>scuba@krause.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/Trackback.aspx?guid=5f8cd0cd-87e6-4f22-aad6-0e41a3e0a8e6</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,5f8cd0cd-87e6-4f22-aad6-0e41a3e0a8e6.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Scuba Staff</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,5f8cd0cd-87e6-4f22-aad6-0e41a3e0a8e6.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=5f8cd0cd-87e6-4f22-aad6-0e41a3e0a8e6</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div>I had a photo course over the past couple of days with a friend. We were shooting
               here in Key Largo, but he brought me some of the images he'd shot in the past including
               a very nice series from Palau's Jellyfish Lake. There was one particular image that
               was so striking compositionally I asked to see the RAW file so we could see what we
               could extract from it using Adobe Lightroom 2. 
               <br /><br />
               Actually, everything we did was done in only a few minutes. The original RAW, bottom
               photo, was very yellow and green. Actually, the water was probably yellow and green,
               but that doesn't mean that we had to be too literal about it. We tweaked the exposure,
               boosted the blacks, and then used the eye-dropper tool to select color. The eye-dropper
               can be used on any area in the photo that is black, 18% gray, or white (white that
               still has detail, that is) and it will add the color shift that will change the overall
               tint to achieve what mathematically the program would deduce is black or white or
               gray. Sometimes, that gets one closer in a single jump than can be done using the
               color balance sliders. Still, one should rarely trust that is the final color fix,
               and fine-tune the color balance. Additionally, we spotted a couple of small bits of
               backscatter, and used the new graduated filter tool, dragging it from the upper right
               down into the fin area. (The graduated filter and adjustment brush, where you can
               actually brush exposure variability onto select portions of the photo are reason enough
               to upgrade from Lightoom 2 from Version 1.0.)  
               <br /><br />
               The adjusted color version is in the center.  Then with a click on the grayscale
               button and a couple of slider tweaks the black and white image resulted. All of that
               is very powerful, but what really rocks is that the images don't exist as megabytes
               on my harddrive until exported. Before that, they are merely instruction sets that
               exist on Virtual Copies of the master RAW shot, and these are only a couple of kilobytes.
               Lightroom presents massive time-saving options to the digital photographer, and keeps
               the archive mass reasonably manageable as well. 
               <br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/IMG_6296.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/IMG_6296-2.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/IMG_6296-3.jpg" border="0" /></div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/aggbug.ashx?id=5f8cd0cd-87e6-4f22-aad6-0e41a3e0a8e6" />
      </body>
      <title>The Power of RAW ... and Lightroom ... and a Great Photo</title>
      <guid>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,5f8cd0cd-87e6-4f22-aad6-0e41a3e0a8e6.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/The+Power+Of+RAW++And+Lightroom++And+A+Great+Photo.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:15:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
   &lt;div&gt;
      &lt;div&gt;
         &lt;div&gt;I had a photo course over the past couple of days with a friend. We were shooting
            here in Key Largo, but he brought me some of the images he'd shot in the past including
            a very nice series from Palau's Jellyfish Lake. There was one particular image that
            was so striking compositionally I asked to see the RAW file so we could see what we
            could extract from it using Adobe Lightroom 2. 
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            Actually, everything we did was done in only a few minutes. The original RAW, bottom
            photo, was very yellow and green. Actually, the water was probably yellow and green,
            but that doesn't mean that we had to be too literal about it. We tweaked the exposure,
            boosted the blacks, and then used the eye-dropper tool to select color. The eye-dropper
            can be used on any area in the photo that is black, 18% gray, or white (white that
            still has detail, that is) and it will add the color shift that will change the overall
            tint to achieve what mathematically the program would deduce is black or white or
            gray. Sometimes, that gets one closer in a single jump than can be done using the
            color balance sliders. Still, one should rarely trust that is the final color fix,
            and fine-tune the color balance. Additionally, we spotted a couple of small bits of
            backscatter, and used the new graduated filter tool, dragging it from the upper right
            down into the fin area. (The graduated filter and adjustment brush, where you can
            actually brush exposure variability onto select portions of the photo are reason enough
            to upgrade from Lightoom 2 from Version 1.0.)&amp;nbsp; 
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            The adjusted color version is in the center.&amp;nbsp; Then with a click on the grayscale
            button and a couple of slider tweaks the black and white image resulted. All of that
            is very powerful, but what really rocks is that the images don't exist as megabytes
            on my harddrive until exported. Before that, they are merely instruction sets that
            exist on Virtual Copies of the master RAW shot, and these are only a couple of kilobytes.
            Lightroom presents massive time-saving options to the digital photographer, and keeps
            the archive mass reasonably manageable as well. 
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/IMG_6296.jpg" border="0"&gt; 
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/IMG_6296-2.jpg" border="0"&gt; 
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/IMG_6296-3.jpg" border="0"&gt;
         &lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;
   &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/aggbug.ashx?id=5f8cd0cd-87e6-4f22-aad6-0e41a3e0a8e6" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,5f8cd0cd-87e6-4f22-aad6-0e41a3e0a8e6.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/Trackback.aspx?guid=9a120883-3808-4563-8bdd-7b690c8e5398</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,9a120883-3808-4563-8bdd-7b690c8e5398.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Scuba Staff</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,9a120883-3808-4563-8bdd-7b690c8e5398.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=9a120883-3808-4563-8bdd-7b690c8e5398</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>I had a nice surprise when I received my newest issues of Digital Photo Pro and
      Outdoor Photographer magazines. Polybagged with each issue was the new 34-page catalog
      published by Canon for their advanced amateur photographers. Entitled "Canon EOS PowerShot
      for Advanced Photographers" this lavish production was anchored by their concept to
      have their Canon Explorers of Light using advanced consumer cameras. All of which
      makes sense, because the line between consumer and professional products is blurring
      all the time ... they are all just so very good these days. Any pro shooter could
      go out and do their job with almost any of the products featured in the catalog, although
      the pro versions might be better weather sealed, or have faster motordrive sequencing,
      or whatever. Still, the consumer products are pretty amazing these days.<br /><br />
      Anyway, as a Canon Explorer of Light, http://www.usa.canon.com/dlc/controller?act=ArtistsListAct,
      my assignment was to shoot the new Canon G10 in the Canon housing. The photos above
      show the cover (a gorgeous shot by Tyler Stableford), one of my underwater shots taken
      with the Canon "point-and-shoot", and the promo materials for the G10 camera.<br /><br />
      I was meant to be on location in Little Cayman for Scuba Diving Magazine when this
      project came due, and it proved to be the perfect place to run the G10 through its
      paces. The shallow reef at the top of Bloody Bay Wall was ideal because the backgrounds
      for fish photography were so nice, the water so clear, and gratefully the fish were
      so accustomed to divers it made getting near enough for quality imaging quite easy.<br /><br />
      Thanks to Travis Gainsley for taking the portrait of me and assisting the underwater
      portion of the shoot, and to my friends at Little Cayman Beach Resort for providing
      the photo-opportunities.<br /><br />
      As for the G10, very cool camera. The native lens is 28mm (28-140mm in 35mm equivalents),
      and therefore a bit wider than the 35mm lens on the G9, and the image quality is superb.
      I've been shooting a Canon G9 as my family and pocket camera for a while now, and
      love the logic of the navigation within the various shoot modes. The G10 preserves
      the ergonomics and RAW capability, and bumps up the megapixel count, and adds the
      Digic 4 processor.<br /><p></p><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Canon_11.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Canon_21.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Canon_3.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Canon_4.jpg" border="0" /></div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/aggbug.ashx?id=9a120883-3808-4563-8bdd-7b690c8e5398" />
      </body>
      <title>Canon Powershot Brochure in Little Cayman</title>
      <guid>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,9a120883-3808-4563-8bdd-7b690c8e5398.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/Canon+Powershot+Brochure+In+Little+Cayman.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:00:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;I had a nice surprise when I received my newest issues of Digital Photo Pro and
   Outdoor Photographer magazines. Polybagged with each issue was the new 34-page catalog
   published by Canon for their advanced amateur photographers. Entitled "Canon EOS PowerShot
   for Advanced Photographers" this lavish production was anchored by their concept to
   have their Canon Explorers of Light using advanced consumer cameras. All of which
   makes sense, because the line between consumer and professional products is blurring
   all the time ... they are all just so very good these days. Any pro shooter could
   go out and do their job with almost any of the products featured in the catalog, although
   the pro versions might be better weather sealed, or have faster motordrive sequencing,
   or whatever. Still, the consumer products are pretty amazing these days.&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   Anyway, as a Canon Explorer of Light, http://www.usa.canon.com/dlc/controller?act=ArtistsListAct,
   my assignment was to shoot the new Canon G10 in the Canon housing. The photos above
   show the cover (a gorgeous shot by Tyler Stableford), one of my underwater shots taken
   with the Canon "point-and-shoot", and the promo materials for the G10 camera.&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   I was meant to be on location in Little Cayman for Scuba Diving Magazine when this
   project came due, and it proved to be the perfect place to run the G10 through its
   paces. The shallow reef at the top of Bloody Bay Wall was ideal because the backgrounds
   for fish photography were so nice, the water so clear, and gratefully the fish were
   so accustomed to divers it made getting near enough for quality imaging quite easy.&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   Thanks to Travis Gainsley for taking the portrait of me and assisting the underwater
   portion of the shoot, and to my friends at Little Cayman Beach Resort for providing
   the photo-opportunities.&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   As for the G10, very cool camera. The native lens is 28mm (28-140mm in 35mm equivalents),
   and therefore a bit wider than the 35mm lens on the G9, and the image quality is superb.
   I've been shooting a Canon G9 as my family and pocket camera for a while now, and
   love the logic of the navigation within the various shoot modes. The G10 preserves
   the ergonomics and RAW capability, and bumps up the megapixel count, and adds the
   Digic 4 processor.&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;p&gt;
   &lt;/p&gt;
   &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Canon_11.jpg" border="0"&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Canon_21.jpg" border="0"&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Canon_3.jpg" border="0"&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Canon_4.jpg" border="0"&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/aggbug.ashx?id=9a120883-3808-4563-8bdd-7b690c8e5398" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,9a120883-3808-4563-8bdd-7b690c8e5398.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/Trackback.aspx?guid=7f6a001e-349b-48c6-bd17-7596722441d6</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,7f6a001e-349b-48c6-bd17-7596722441d6.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Scuba Staff</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,7f6a001e-349b-48c6-bd17-7596722441d6.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=7f6a001e-349b-48c6-bd17-7596722441d6</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>I'm not a videographer. But, I am a big fan of any means to get a better still
            image, and that includes using video to do so. Which these days, includes technology
            introduced by the RED system. http://www.red.com/<br /><br />
            There has been a lot of chatter on various photography user groups about the potential
            of the RED digital cameras, in their current iteration and in terms of new products
            predicted. I'd tell you more about it, but truthfully don't know much more than I
            read on the web. This from RED's website: 
            <br /><br /><i>Typical high-end HD camcorders have 2.1M pixel sensors and record with 3:1:1 color
            sub-sampled video at up to 30fps. RED offers the Mysterium ™ Super 35mm cine sized
            (24.4×13.7mm) sensor, which provides 4K (up to 30 fps), 3K (up to 60 fps) and 2K (up
            to 120 fps) capture, and all this with wide dynamic range and color space in 12 bit
            native RAW. At 4K, that’s more than 5 times the amount of information available every
            second and a vastly superior recording quality. In addition, you get the same breathtaking
            Depth of Field and selective focus as found in film cameras using equivalent 35mm
            P/L mount lenses.<br /></i><br />
            Of course, most are talking about the RED as competition to 35mm film for cinema projects,
            or video that massively out-resolves existing high definition technology. But, there
            is also the camp that contends that it won't be long until, for some types of photography,
            single frames from the RED will be competitive with the capture quality from still
            cameras. Imagine a sports shooter covering the 100-meter dash at the Olympics. Put
            the RED on a tripod and let it roll. Send the clip back to an editor and let them
            decide what the iconic, decisive frozen-moment-in-time might be. At the same time,
            there is video clip that can be used for the client's website. RED for web is overkill
            perhaps, but it will be done. As bandwidth and hard-drives increase in speed and capacity,
            it all seems very plausible.<br /><br />
            Given all the excitement and hype, I've been very eager to see the current state of
            the art in RED image capture, and when my friend George Monteiro (from Sea-Cam video
            productions) stopped by my studio recently (he was down to do a test shoot underwater
            in Key Largo), I asked him to e-mail me a few sample JPGs from the day. Obviously,
            within the context of a blog you'll never be able to decipher image quality variables,
            but when I dug into the files in Photoshop I made a few basic deductions:<br /><br />
            1. RED topside - The shot of the covered bridge is quite impressive. It was transmitted
            as a small JPG, but opened in Photoshop as a 24MB, 8-bit file. That's about the size
            file I would expect from a 10-12 megapixel digital still camera. Not necessarily all
            the detail I'd expect to see from a 12-megapixel camera, but considering this is a
            still frame from a video, amazing. It held detail quite well in the 100% enlargement.
            See the screengrab from Actual pixels in Photoshop. Considering the context, stunning
            really.<br /><br />
            2. RED underwater - Here's a few of George's comments in his post to me:<br /><br /><i>Here are a few test stills I pulled from yesterday's shoot. Please don't judge
            them for composition most are from the middle or end of a tracking or pan shot. But
            they will show you the native resolution of the red in 4K mode at 30FPS with a wide
            open shutter (1/30th of a second) so you will see motion blur in the close fast moving
            fish. The images have been compressed as Jpegs to about a half meg each. They were
            shot in natural light with a UR Pro with a dome port using the 18mm setting on the
            wide angle Red zoom lens ... I color corrected them for maximum dynamic range in RED
            Cine and used the various white balance features to achieve what I thought was agood
            balance. They may be a little contrasty and over saturated but this was my first attempt
            with underwater footage with RED.<br /></i><br />
            He made the other significant comment that it was all shot at 1/30th of a second.
            I asked why 1/30th, immediately thinking back to the very old analog days when the
            Pentax 6x7 I bought was essentially DOA for underwater use because it only would synch
            with strobe at 1/30th second and slower. 1/30th was way too slow for most things I
            shot on the reef, and only acceptable with wide angle shots with models, or shots
            in low ambient light. He explained, logically enough, that choosing faster shutter
            speeds made the video less "fluid" and more choppy. Faster shutter speeds would be
            better for freezing the action of moving fish in a still frame grab, but may not be
            the perfect solution for optimizing video. Apparently, that will be a consideration
            when choosing shoot parameters primarily for video (motion) versus primarily for extracting
            stills.<br /><br />
            George was dialing in a new dome, and in looking at the JPGs I see he probably missed
            focusing on the virtual image correctly, as the underwater shots aren't as sharp as
            the topside shots he showed me. However, finding the exact nodal point for a zoom
            lens is a complicated matter, and getting it right the first time would be a lucky
            thing indeed. Still, if the camera renders a sharp still frame topside, there is no
            reason it won't do the same underwater with the right port and port extension. The
            RED zoom focuses very close, so I doubt that it will need a diopter to focus on the
            virtual image, once the focus "sweet spot'' is determined for the dome of choice.
            George already has a plan to improve the result in his next dives.<br /><br />
            The same rules that apply to minimizing optical aberrations with a housed still camera
            will apply to the housings for the RED. For moving pictures there is probably some
            latitude for smearing corners, but the higher the camera resolution, the more optical
            flaws will be evident. And, when those optical flaws are frozen, in a still frame,
            they are ever more obvious.<br /><br />
            From this it is clear that RED bears strong potential for use underwater, but the
            housing manufacturers will have to get very serious about dome performance if these
            images are to hold up to publishing standards, competitive with existing still technology.
            Still, there will be some subjects that might never be captured any other way, and
            for these the RED will be marvelous. 
            <br /><br />
            Of course, technological convergence cuts both ways. As RED creates video technology
            that encroaches on the potential of still imaging, Canon has just introduced their
            5DII still digital camera, capable of capturing high definition video, separate or
            even simultaneous with a 21-megapixel still digital photo. And as RED gets ready to
            announce their new modular system, you can bet that our traditional camera manufacturers
            are pursuing revolutionary upgrades of their own. 
            <br /><br />
            These are fascinating times to be a shooter, for sure.<br /><br /><br /><div align="center"><i><b>All images © George Monteiro, all rights reserved.<br /></b></i></div><p></p><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Top_full.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Top_100.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Picture%201.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Picture%202.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Picture%203.jpg" border="0" /></div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/aggbug.ashx?id=7f6a001e-349b-48c6-bd17-7596722441d6" />
      </body>
      <title>RED camera - Early Test Observations</title>
      <guid>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,7f6a001e-349b-48c6-bd17-7596722441d6.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/RED+Camera++Early+Test+Observations.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:30:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
   &lt;div&gt;
      &lt;div&gt;I'm not a videographer. But, I am a big fan of any means to get a better still
         image, and that includes using video to do so. Which these days, includes technology
         introduced by the RED system. http://www.red.com/&lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         There has been a lot of chatter on various photography user groups about the potential
         of the RED digital cameras, in their current iteration and in terms of new products
         predicted. I'd tell you more about it, but truthfully don't know much more than I
         read on the web. This from RED's website: 
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;i&gt;Typical high-end HD camcorders have 2.1M pixel sensors and record with 3:1:1 color
         sub-sampled video at up to 30fps. RED offers the Mysterium ™ Super 35mm cine sized
         (24.4×13.7mm) sensor, which provides 4K (up to 30 fps), 3K (up to 60 fps) and 2K (up
         to 120 fps) capture, and all this with wide dynamic range and color space in 12 bit
         native RAW. At 4K, that’s more than 5 times the amount of information available every
         second and a vastly superior recording quality. In addition, you get the same breathtaking
         Depth of Field and selective focus as found in film cameras using equivalent 35mm
         P/L mount lenses.&lt;br&gt;
         &lt;/i&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         Of course, most are talking about the RED as competition to 35mm film for cinema projects,
         or video that massively out-resolves existing high definition technology. But, there
         is also the camp that contends that it won't be long until, for some types of photography,
         single frames from the RED will be competitive with the capture quality from still
         cameras. Imagine a sports shooter covering the 100-meter dash at the Olympics. Put
         the RED on a tripod and let it roll. Send the clip back to an editor and let them
         decide what the iconic, decisive frozen-moment-in-time might be. At the same time,
         there is video clip that can be used for the client's website. RED for web is overkill
         perhaps, but it will be done. As bandwidth and hard-drives increase in speed and capacity,
         it all seems very plausible.&lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         Given all the excitement and hype, I've been very eager to see the current state of
         the art in RED image capture, and when my friend George Monteiro (from Sea-Cam video
         productions) stopped by my studio recently (he was down to do a test shoot underwater
         in Key Largo), I asked him to e-mail me a few sample JPGs from the day. Obviously,
         within the context of a blog you'll never be able to decipher image quality variables,
         but when I dug into the files in Photoshop I made a few basic deductions:&lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         1. RED topside - The shot of the covered bridge is quite impressive. It was transmitted
         as a small JPG, but opened in Photoshop as a 24MB, 8-bit file. That's about the size
         file I would expect from a 10-12 megapixel digital still camera. Not necessarily all
         the detail I'd expect to see from a 12-megapixel camera, but considering this is a
         still frame from a video, amazing. It held detail quite well in the 100% enlargement.
         See the screengrab from Actual pixels in Photoshop. Considering the context, stunning
         really.&lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         2. RED underwater - Here's a few of George's comments in his post to me:&lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;i&gt;Here are a few test stills I pulled from yesterday's shoot. Please don't judge
         them for composition most are from the middle or end of a tracking or pan shot. But
         they will show you the native resolution of the red in 4K mode at 30FPS with a wide
         open shutter (1/30th of a second) so you will see motion blur in the close fast moving
         fish. The images have been compressed as Jpegs to about a half meg each. They were
         shot in natural light with a UR Pro with a dome port using the 18mm setting on the
         wide angle Red zoom lens ... I color corrected them for maximum dynamic range in RED
         Cine and used the various white balance features to achieve what I thought was agood
         balance. They may be a little contrasty and over saturated but this was my first attempt
         with underwater footage with RED.&lt;br&gt;
         &lt;/i&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         He made the other significant comment that it was all shot at 1/30th of a second.
         I asked why 1/30th, immediately thinking back to the very old analog days when the
         Pentax 6x7 I bought was essentially DOA for underwater use because it only would synch
         with strobe at 1/30th second and slower. 1/30th was way too slow for most things I
         shot on the reef, and only acceptable with wide angle shots with models, or shots
         in low ambient light. He explained, logically enough, that choosing faster shutter
         speeds made the video less "fluid" and more choppy. Faster shutter speeds would be
         better for freezing the action of moving fish in a still frame grab, but may not be
         the perfect solution for optimizing video. Apparently, that will be a consideration
         when choosing shoot parameters primarily for video (motion) versus primarily for extracting
         stills.&lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         George was dialing in a new dome, and in looking at the JPGs I see he probably missed
         focusing on the virtual image correctly, as the underwater shots aren't as sharp as
         the topside shots he showed me. However, finding the exact nodal point for a zoom
         lens is a complicated matter, and getting it right the first time would be a lucky
         thing indeed. Still, if the camera renders a sharp still frame topside, there is no
         reason it won't do the same underwater with the right port and port extension. The
         RED zoom focuses very close, so I doubt that it will need a diopter to focus on the
         virtual image, once the focus "sweet spot'' is determined for the dome of choice.
         George already has a plan to improve the result in his next dives.&lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         The same rules that apply to minimizing optical aberrations with a housed still camera
         will apply to the housings for the RED. For moving pictures there is probably some
         latitude for smearing corners, but the higher the camera resolution, the more optical
         flaws will be evident. And, when those optical flaws are frozen, in a still frame,
         they are ever more obvious.&lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         From this it is clear that RED bears strong potential for use underwater, but the
         housing manufacturers will have to get very serious about dome performance if these
         images are to hold up to publishing standards, competitive with existing still technology.
         Still, there will be some subjects that might never be captured any other way, and
         for these the RED will be marvelous. 
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         Of course, technological convergence cuts both ways. As RED creates video technology
         that encroaches on the potential of still imaging, Canon has just introduced their
         5DII still digital camera, capable of capturing high definition video, separate or
         even simultaneous with a 21-megapixel still digital photo. And as RED gets ready to
         announce their new modular system, you can bet that our traditional camera manufacturers
         are pursuing revolutionary upgrades of their own. 
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         These are fascinating times to be a shooter, for sure.&lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;div align="center"&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;All images © George Monteiro, all rights reserved.&lt;br&gt;
            &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;
         &lt;/div&gt;
         &lt;p&gt;
         &lt;/p&gt;
         &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Top_full.jpg" border="0"&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Top_100.jpg" border="0"&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Picture%201.jpg" border="0"&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Picture%202.jpg" border="0"&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Picture%203.jpg" border="0"&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;
   &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/aggbug.ashx?id=7f6a001e-349b-48c6-bd17-7596722441d6" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,7f6a001e-349b-48c6-bd17-7596722441d6.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/Trackback.aspx?guid=dc64f14c-bcf2-4620-9c82-37209358ddae</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,dc64f14c-bcf2-4620-9c82-37209358ddae.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Scuba Staff</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,dc64f14c-bcf2-4620-9c82-37209358ddae.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=dc64f14c-bcf2-4620-9c82-37209358ddae</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div>I had a phone conversation with photographer Tom Kline recently. He lives in
               Alaska and does very interesting research and documentary photography with marine
               life of the region. We had been chatting about a polecam system he was using to photograph
               herring at night from a boat, which made me think of other photo-ops he might encounter
               that might be particularly challenging. Like, photographing salmon in local streams,
               for example. 
               <br /><br />
               Aside from the obvious challenge of not wanting to be where a grizzly bear might be
               working the same salmon, Tom said the biggest problem is light. He said the days are
               very short in Alaska in the particular season when the salmon are running. The issue
               is further complicated by the mountainous terrain. The sun drops behind the ridges
               very early in the day, and even when it is "piercing" the canyons, it is like dusk
               in the Caribbean. So, Tom decided he needed to take his daylight with him.<br /><br />
               To that end, his salmon-shooter involved building an aluminum "sled" that would hold
               his Seacam housing and Nikon D2X solidly on the stream bed. Then a set of rails held
               one Inon strobe (chosen for their small weight and easy maneuverability ... a huge
               issue when schlepping the system back into the woods) hard wired to the housing. That
               strobe pointed not towards the water, but up to an array of 5 other Inon strobe heads.
               Each of these strobes are set to slave mode, and would fire when the hard-wired strobe
               went off. It is these 5 strobes that aim back towards the stream, in front of the
               lens, at the point where the salmon are meant to swim. At that point, Tom takes a
               long remote cord, sits on the bank of the river, and fires the camera once the salmon
               swim into view.<br /><br />
               Very clever solution to a unique photographic challenge.<br /><br /><br /><p></p><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Thomas_Kline_Selects_15.JPG" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Thomas_Kline_Selects_16.JPG" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Thomas_Kline_Selects_17.JPG" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Thomas_Kline_Selects_18.JPG" border="0" /></div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/aggbug.ashx?id=dc64f14c-bcf2-4620-9c82-37209358ddae" />
      </body>
      <title>Solutions - Tom Kline on photographing salmon in Alaska</title>
      <guid>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,dc64f14c-bcf2-4620-9c82-37209358ddae.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/Solutions++Tom+Kline+On+Photographing+Salmon+In+Alaska.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:21:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
   &lt;div&gt;
      &lt;div&gt;
         &lt;div&gt;I had a phone conversation with photographer Tom Kline recently. He lives in
            Alaska and does very interesting research and documentary photography with marine
            life of the region. We had been chatting about a polecam system he was using to photograph
            herring at night from a boat, which made me think of other photo-ops he might encounter
            that might be particularly challenging. Like, photographing salmon in local streams,
            for example. 
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            Aside from the obvious challenge of not wanting to be where a grizzly bear might be
            working the same salmon, Tom said the biggest problem is light. He said the days are
            very short in Alaska in the particular season when the salmon are running. The issue
            is further complicated by the mountainous terrain. The sun drops behind the ridges
            very early in the day, and even when it is "piercing" the canyons, it is like dusk
            in the Caribbean. So, Tom decided he needed to take his daylight with him.&lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            To that end, his salmon-shooter involved building an aluminum "sled" that would hold
            his Seacam housing and Nikon D2X solidly on the stream bed. Then a set of rails held
            one Inon strobe (chosen for their small weight and easy maneuverability ... a huge
            issue when schlepping the system back into the woods) hard wired to the housing. That
            strobe pointed not towards the water, but up to an array of 5 other Inon strobe heads.
            Each of these strobes are set to slave mode, and would fire when the hard-wired strobe
            went off. It is these 5 strobes that aim back towards the stream, in front of the
            lens, at the point where the salmon are meant to swim. At that point, Tom takes a
            long remote cord, sits on the bank of the river, and fires the camera once the salmon
            swim into view.&lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            Very clever solution to a unique photographic challenge.&lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;p&gt;
            &lt;/p&gt;
            &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Thomas_Kline_Selects_15.JPG" border="0"&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Thomas_Kline_Selects_16.JPG" border="0"&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Thomas_Kline_Selects_17.JPG" border="0"&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Thomas_Kline_Selects_18.JPG" border="0"&gt;
         &lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;
   &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/aggbug.ashx?id=dc64f14c-bcf2-4620-9c82-37209358ddae" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,dc64f14c-bcf2-4620-9c82-37209358ddae.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/Trackback.aspx?guid=c55b7e66-9f2d-4373-9671-1abe6472ae7e</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,c55b7e66-9f2d-4373-9671-1abe6472ae7e.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Scuba Staff</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,c55b7e66-9f2d-4373-9671-1abe6472ae7e.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=c55b7e66-9f2d-4373-9671-1abe6472ae7e</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <br />
          <br />
      I know this is a bit early to get excited for a trip that is not scheduled until summer
      2011, but we did a trip to British Columbia and Alaska several years ago aboard the
      Nautilus Explorer, and that still remains vivid in my mind as one of my all time favorite
      live-aboard adventures. 
      <br /><br />
      For that one, please see:<br />
      http://www.stephenfrink.com/sf-reports/200407alaska/<br /><br />
      The summer cruising season to this region is very short, and 2010 and all the rest
      of 2011 is sold out for the Nautilus Explorer. However, we were fortunate enough to
      have them hold a charter for us in the very heart of the best-of-the-best time to
      be there. This time it is a special itinerary to Alaska only. See the letter below
      from Captain Mike Lever of Nautilus Explorer to know what to expect:<br /><br />
      "Our Alaska journeys have continued to evolve and get better and better since you
      were last onboard. The diving, scenery and experiences up here were always spectacular
      but with each passing season, we are getting more and more dialed in, discovering
      more "kick-ass" dive sites, obtaining additional permits and fine tuning the very
      best places to see the big critters -- humpback whales, sealions, sea otter, grizzly
      bears, giant pacific octopus and wolfeels. We now have one site with 10 wolfeels and
      can practically guarantee octopus sightings for example!<br /><br />
      Sample Itinerary: Departure Date: Wed Jul 6, 2011. The ship will be available for
      boarding in Juneau at 6:00 pm. The ship is scheduled to sail at 8:00 pm. Disembarking
      in Ketchikan on Sat Jul 16, 2011 at 9:00 am.<br /><br />
      Day 1: Dinner-time board in Juneau. Evening steam and anchor before midnight.<br /><br />
      Day 2-4: Wake up at Point Adolphus at the entrance to Glacier Bay for the best humpback
      whale viewing in southeast Alaska plus eagles and stellar sealions. 3 hour sail to
      Indian Island at the entrance to Icy Strait where we will anchor for the next 3 days.
      Excellent invertebrate diving plus stellar sealions on every dive with vis usually
      20 - 30 feet. Zodiac tours and kayaking with fantastic photo op's up close with humpback
      whales, sealions, sea otters, bald eagles, etc. Finish off with an evening visit to
      the tiny boardwalk community of Elfin Cove.<br /><br />
      Day 5: Wake up at Baranoff Warm Springs. 2 great dives with loads of scallops, anemones
      and kelp plus a visit to the hot-springs.<br /><br />
      Day 6: Patterson Point. Reliable octopus sightings. Breathtaking scenery at anchor
      in a steep sided fjord. This is the most beautiful inlet we have ever seen and we
      have seen grizzly bears on every visit here.<br /><br />
      Day 7 - 8: Port Alexander/Wooden Island. Great place for zodiac tours and kayaking
      and shore visit to Port Alexander not to mention varied and excellent diving - both
      invertebrate and critters including 10 wolf eels around a single rock.<br /><br />
      Day 9: Le Conte glacier. Iceberg day!!<br /><br />
      Day 10: Prince of Wales Island. Steep wall diving, 10,000 swimming<br />
      scallops, varied diving, early evening arrival Ketchikan.<br /><br />
      Day 11: morning disembark” 
      <br /><br />
      I know what some of you may be thinking ... I don't do cold water. I had that thought
      the first time to British Columbia and Alaska as well, but with modern drysuits the
      cold is not an issue, and truthfully, I have never seen greater density and diversity
      of life underwater than beneath these Emerald Seas. Plus, for the most part, things
      don't move quickly and the photo opportunities are extraordinarily productive. Yet,
      for all of that, the best of this trip happens above the water. Seeing glaciers calf,
      watching eagles and grizzly bears and stellar sealions, trying our hand at over/unders
      with salmon, relaxing in a natural hotspring, and photographing humpback whales are
      pure phototgrapic inspiration! 
      <br /><br />
      My wife Barbara and daughter Alexa were aboard for the last trip and they didn't even
      go diving. Still, they found this was one of our best family vacations ever. In fact,
      Barbara just came in and looked over my shoulder as I was looking at photos from the
      last trip, and she confirmed, emphatically, that she wouldn't be diving this time
      either! Oh well, her loss, because for sure I'll be diving. You can dress for cold,
      but you can't experience the magic below without jumping into it.<br /><br />
      Even though 2011 is a long way away, this is a very special trip, and I appreciate
      the cooperation and consideration our friends at Nautilus Explorer have extended in
      giving us this absolutely perfect seasonal opportunity to visit Alaska.<br /><p></p><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/T1340696D.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Steve_ice_BobBrace.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/T1340824D.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/F43271D.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/F43105D.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/T1340941D.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/W67576D.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/T1340679D.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/F43369D.jpg" border="0" /></div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/aggbug.ashx?id=c55b7e66-9f2d-4373-9671-1abe6472ae7e" />
      </body>
      <title>Now for Something Entirely Different - Alaska!</title>
      <guid>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,c55b7e66-9f2d-4373-9671-1abe6472ae7e.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/Now+For+Something+Entirely+Different++Alaska.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:13:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   I know this is a bit early to get excited for a trip that is not scheduled until summer
   2011, but we did a trip to British Columbia and Alaska several years ago aboard the
   Nautilus Explorer, and that still remains vivid in my mind as one of my all time favorite
   live-aboard adventures. 
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   For that one, please see:&lt;br&gt;
   http://www.stephenfrink.com/sf-reports/200407alaska/&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   The summer cruising season to this region is very short, and 2010 and all the rest
   of 2011 is sold out for the Nautilus Explorer. However, we were fortunate enough to
   have them hold a charter for us in the very heart of the best-of-the-best time to
   be there. This time it is a special itinerary to Alaska only. See the letter below
   from Captain Mike Lever of Nautilus Explorer to know what to expect:&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   "Our Alaska journeys have continued to evolve and get better and better since you
   were last onboard. The diving, scenery and experiences up here were always spectacular
   but with each passing season, we are getting more and more dialed in, discovering
   more "kick-ass" dive sites, obtaining additional permits and fine tuning the very
   best places to see the big critters -- humpback whales, sealions, sea otter, grizzly
   bears, giant pacific octopus and wolfeels. We now have one site with 10 wolfeels and
   can practically guarantee octopus sightings for example!&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   Sample Itinerary: Departure Date: Wed Jul 6, 2011. The ship will be available for
   boarding in Juneau at 6:00 pm. The ship is scheduled to sail at 8:00 pm. Disembarking
   in Ketchikan on Sat Jul 16, 2011 at 9:00 am.&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   Day 1: Dinner-time board in Juneau. Evening steam and anchor before midnight.&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   Day 2-4: Wake up at Point Adolphus at the entrance to Glacier Bay for the best humpback
   whale viewing in southeast Alaska plus eagles and stellar sealions. 3 hour sail to
   Indian Island at the entrance to Icy Strait where we will anchor for the next 3 days.
   Excellent invertebrate diving plus stellar sealions on every dive with vis usually
   20 - 30 feet. Zodiac tours and kayaking with fantastic photo op's up close with humpback
   whales, sealions, sea otters, bald eagles, etc. Finish off with an evening visit to
   the tiny boardwalk community of Elfin Cove.&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   Day 5: Wake up at Baranoff Warm Springs. 2 great dives with loads of scallops, anemones
   and kelp plus a visit to the hot-springs.&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   Day 6: Patterson Point. Reliable octopus sightings. Breathtaking scenery at anchor
   in a steep sided fjord. This is the most beautiful inlet we have ever seen and we
   have seen grizzly bears on every visit here.&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   Day 7 - 8: Port Alexander/Wooden Island. Great place for zodiac tours and kayaking
   and shore visit to Port Alexander not to mention varied and excellent diving - both
   invertebrate and critters including 10 wolf eels around a single rock.&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   Day 9: Le Conte glacier. Iceberg day!!&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   Day 10: Prince of Wales Island. Steep wall diving, 10,000 swimming&lt;br&gt;
   scallops, varied diving, early evening arrival Ketchikan.&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   Day 11: morning disembark” 
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   I know what some of you may be thinking ... I don't do cold water. I had that thought
   the first time to British Columbia and Alaska as well, but with modern drysuits the
   cold is not an issue, and truthfully, I have never seen greater density and diversity
   of life underwater than beneath these Emerald Seas. Plus, for the most part, things
   don't move quickly and the photo opportunities are extraordinarily productive. Yet,
   for all of that, the best of this trip happens above the water. Seeing glaciers calf,
   watching eagles and grizzly bears and stellar sealions, trying our hand at over/unders
   with salmon, relaxing in a natural hotspring, and photographing humpback whales are
   pure phototgrapic inspiration! 
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   My wife Barbara and daughter Alexa were aboard for the last trip and they didn't even
   go diving. Still, they found this was one of our best family vacations ever. In fact,
   Barbara just came in and looked over my shoulder as I was looking at photos from the
   last trip, and she confirmed, emphatically, that she wouldn't be diving this time
   either! Oh well, her loss, because for sure I'll be diving. You can dress for cold,
   but you can't experience the magic below without jumping into it.&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   Even though 2011 is a long way away, this is a very special trip, and I appreciate
   the cooperation and consideration our friends at Nautilus Explorer have extended in
   giving us this absolutely perfect seasonal opportunity to visit Alaska.&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;p&gt;
   &lt;/p&gt;
   &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/T1340696D.jpg" border="0"&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Steve_ice_BobBrace.jpg" border="0"&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/T1340824D.jpg" border="0"&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/F43271D.jpg" border="0"&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/F43105D.jpg" border="0"&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/T1340941D.jpg" border="0"&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/W67576D.jpg" border="0"&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/T1340679D.jpg" border="0"&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/F43369D.jpg" border="0"&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/aggbug.ashx?id=c55b7e66-9f2d-4373-9671-1abe6472ae7e" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,c55b7e66-9f2d-4373-9671-1abe6472ae7e.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/Trackback.aspx?guid=9d555862-c50a-4cda-9ce7-63c00b5accde</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,9d555862-c50a-4cda-9ce7-63c00b5accde.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Scuba Staff</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,9d555862-c50a-4cda-9ce7-63c00b5accde.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=9d555862-c50a-4cda-9ce7-63c00b5accde</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>I just got home from a great trip to Indonesia, beginning in Ambon and cruising
         to Raja Ampat on the Seven Seas.  Terrific boat and crew, and big shout-out to
         Stew Esposito, cruise director on board, for going the extra mile at every step along
         charter; but especially for shepherding our bags on board the ExpressAir flight out
         of Sorong.  Nothing worse than getting home without your bags.  (Well, plenty
         things are worse than that, but still, something to be avoided whenever possible).<br /><br />
         The trip had very nice diversity, with good wide angle potential in the Banda Sea
         (although there were plenty of critter options there too) and the wealth of creatures
         and soft coral backgrounds that make fish and macro photography so interesting in
         Raja Ampat.<br /><br />
         I'll get around to writing a proper article about the trip one day soon, but for now
         here's a brief glimpse of the kinds of photo-ops we encountered on our 12 days at
         sea.<br /><p></p><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/T131E460.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/T131E502.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/T131E350.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/F37E331-Edit.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/W60E176.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/F370499.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/F371030.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/F370929.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/W60E044.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/F370718.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/F370407.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/F370748.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/T131E406.jpg" border="0" /></div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/aggbug.ashx?id=9d555862-c50a-4cda-9ce7-63c00b5accde" />
      </body>
      <title>Pix from the Road - Ambon to Raja Ampat</title>
      <guid>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,9d555862-c50a-4cda-9ce7-63c00b5accde.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/Pix+From+The+Road++Ambon+To+Raja+Ampat.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:35:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
   &lt;div&gt;I just got home from a great trip to Indonesia, beginning in Ambon and cruising
      to Raja Ampat on the Seven Seas.&amp;nbsp; Terrific boat and crew, and big shout-out to
      Stew Esposito, cruise director on board, for going the extra mile at every step along
      charter; but especially for shepherding our bags on board the ExpressAir flight out
      of Sorong.&amp;nbsp; Nothing worse than getting home without your bags.&amp;nbsp; (Well, plenty
      things are worse than that, but still, something to be avoided whenever possible).&lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      The trip had very nice diversity, with good wide angle potential in the Banda Sea
      (although there were plenty of critter options there too) and the wealth of creatures
      and soft coral backgrounds that make fish and macro photography so interesting in
      Raja Ampat.&lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      I'll get around to writing a proper article about the trip one day soon, but for now
      here's a brief glimpse of the kinds of photo-ops we encountered on our 12 days at
      sea.&lt;br&gt;
      &lt;p&gt;
      &lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/T131E460.jpg" border="0"&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/T131E502.jpg" border="0"&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/T131E350.jpg" border="0"&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/F37E331-Edit.jpg" border="0"&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/W60E176.jpg" border="0"&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/F370499.jpg" border="0"&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/F371030.jpg" border="0"&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/F370929.jpg" border="0"&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/W60E044.jpg" border="0"&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/F370718.jpg" border="0"&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/F370407.jpg" border="0"&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/F370748.jpg" border="0"&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/T131E406.jpg" border="0"&gt;
   &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/aggbug.ashx?id=9d555862-c50a-4cda-9ce7-63c00b5accde" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,9d555862-c50a-4cda-9ce7-63c00b5accde.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/Trackback.aspx?guid=cdae743e-a6b6-46b2-a555-787ec2443891</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,cdae743e-a6b6-46b2-a555-787ec2443891.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Scuba Staff</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,cdae743e-a6b6-46b2-a555-787ec2443891.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=cdae743e-a6b6-46b2-a555-787ec2443891</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>I just came home from 12 days in Indonesia, Ambon to Raja Ampat. One nice thing
      about having so much luxury of time aboard the boat is that I was able to do some
      testing and experimenting, something never possible on a commercial shoot that has
      to get knocked out in a couple of days on location.<br /><br />
      Since there was so much macro life to shoot, I was particularly interested in the
      external wet diopter. I shoot Seacam, so my diopter was the Seacam Wet Two, but there
      were a couple of Woody's diopters onboard being used on Subal systems, and I found
      my observations below are generally indicative of their product as well:<br /><br />
      1. The magnification difference between no diopter and the Wet Two is significant.
      To test accurately I shot my 100 macro lens on a Canon 1DsMKIII (full frame) and manually
      dialed the lens out to minimum focus. The wider shots of the little sea apple and
      nudibranchs shown here represent full 1:1, lens racked out all the way and then camera
      moved forward until accurate focus achieved. Then I added the Wet Two (that's the
      beauty of these close-up lenses, they can be added and removed while underwater) and
      then moved closer until focus popped. You can see the relative enlargement they actually
      do provide. Quite impressive really. 
      <br /><br />
      2. The position of the front of the lens relative to the rear of the flat port glass
      is a massive variable. i tried to simulate this topside with shots of my watch face.
      You'll see the first shot is 1:1, minimum focus no diopter. The second shot is minimum
      focus with Wet Two and lens right up next to the rear of the macro port glass. The
      third shot, the one with all the smearing and optical aberrations at the edges, is
      with the lens maybe 2 inches from the rear of the glass. 
      <br /><br />
      It is important to note that macro lenses can be fairly casual about how they fit
      behind a flat port. They just have to not vignette and they'll work. But, to properly
      use a wet diopter, the front of the macro lens must be very, very close to the back
      of the glass on the macro port. Of course, this is easier with an internally focusing
      lens constantly at one point. But even with an extending lens, like the old style
      60mm and 105mm micro Nikkors, the macro port extensions need to be designed so that
      the maximum lens extension (coincidentally, minimum focus) falls in proximity to the
      port glass if effective use of wet diopter is a goal.<br /><br /><p></p><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/1.JPG" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/2.JPG" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/3.JPG" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/4.JPG" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/5.JPG" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/6.JPG" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/7.JPG" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/8.JPG" border="0" /></div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/aggbug.ashx?id=cdae743e-a6b6-46b2-a555-787ec2443891" />
      </body>
      <title>Wet diopters</title>
      <guid>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,cdae743e-a6b6-46b2-a555-787ec2443891.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/Wet+Diopters.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 16:50:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;I just came home from 12 days in Indonesia, Ambon to Raja Ampat. One nice thing
   about having so much luxury of time aboard the boat is that I was able to do some
   testing and experimenting, something never possible on a commercial shoot that has
   to get knocked out in a couple of days on location.&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   Since there was so much macro life to shoot, I was particularly interested in the
   external wet diopter. I shoot Seacam, so my diopter was the Seacam Wet Two, but there
   were a couple of Woody's diopters onboard being used on Subal systems, and I found
   my observations below are generally indicative of their product as well:&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   1. The magnification difference between no diopter and the Wet Two is significant.
   To test accurately I shot my 100 macro lens on a Canon 1DsMKIII (full frame) and manually
   dialed the lens out to minimum focus. The wider shots of the little sea apple and
   nudibranchs shown here represent full 1:1, lens racked out all the way and then camera
   moved forward until accurate focus achieved. Then I added the Wet Two (that's the
   beauty of these close-up lenses, they can be added and removed while underwater) and
   then moved closer until focus popped. You can see the relative enlargement they actually
   do provide. Quite impressive really. 
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   2. The position of the front of the lens relative to the rear of the flat port glass
   is a massive variable. i tried to simulate this topside with shots of my watch face.
   You'll see the first shot is 1:1, minimum focus no diopter. The second shot is minimum
   focus with Wet Two and lens right up next to the rear of the macro port glass. The
   third shot, the one with all the smearing and optical aberrations at the edges, is
   with the lens maybe 2 inches from the rear of the glass. 
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   It is important to note that macro lenses can be fairly casual about how they fit
   behind a flat port. They just have to not vignette and they'll work. But, to properly
   use a wet diopter, the front of the macro lens must be very, very close to the back
   of the glass on the macro port. Of course, this is easier with an internally focusing
   lens constantly at one point. But even with an extending lens, like the old style
   60mm and 105mm micro Nikkors, the macro port extensions need to be designed so that
   the maximum lens extension (coincidentally, minimum focus) falls in proximity to the
   port glass if effective use of wet diopter is a goal.&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;p&gt;
   &lt;/p&gt;
   &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/1.JPG" border="0"&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/2.JPG" border="0"&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/3.JPG" border="0"&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/4.JPG" border="0"&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/5.JPG" border="0"&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/6.JPG" border="0"&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/7.JPG" border="0"&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/8.JPG" border="0"&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/aggbug.ashx?id=cdae743e-a6b6-46b2-a555-787ec2443891" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,cdae743e-a6b6-46b2-a555-787ec2443891.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/Trackback.aspx?guid=66ae6e50-4dce-40a6-8222-5faf9d139381</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,66ae6e50-4dce-40a6-8222-5faf9d139381.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Scuba Staff</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,66ae6e50-4dce-40a6-8222-5faf9d139381.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=66ae6e50-4dce-40a6-8222-5faf9d139381</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>A diver's facemask is their window on the underwater world, but for a photographer
            it is even more important.  If you can't see it you can't shoot it.  To
            that end, there are a number of things I look for in a favorite shooter mask:<br /><br />
            1.  Black silicone skirt - this is the most important thing for me, and is the
            first parameter I consider.  Silicone because it is more comfortable than the
            old rubber masks of yesteryear, but black for the same reason Ansel Adams put a black
            focusing cloth over his head when working with his view camera outside in Yosemite. 
            There is a need to block extraneous light from the groundglass to optimize contrast
            and resolution, and black does so obviously far better than a clear skirted mask. 
            I like clear skirted masks for my models, because they are more attractive and easier
            to light, but for me, with my eye to a viewfinder on a housed D-SLR, black always.<br /><br />
            2.  High light-transmission glass - Some glass has higher miscellaneous mineral
            content than others and it can affect light transmission.  In fact, when I first
            got my Atomic Ultra-clear I shot a photo through that mask and my old shooter mask
            as a comparison, just to check out the meter readings with the only variable being
            type of glass in front of the camera lens.  I could actually deduce a significant
            difference in the histogram of the two shots, with the curve moving more to the right
            with the Atomic mask, empirically proving greater light transmission with the Ultraclear
            glass.  Better glass is brighter glass, and if more light passes through the
            mask, my underwater visual acuity is enhanced.  
            <br /><br />
            3.  Gauge reader - I wear reading glasses, but have perfect distance vision. 
            So, I can pick out any of the big stuff on the reef, but am challenged by the little
            reef minutia, pygmy seahorses and such.  But, the bigger issue was that I had
            a hard time reading all the digital menus and arcane pathways I had to navigate to
            change camera custom settings.  But, now that I use a ground gauge reader applied
            to the lower left corner of my shooter mask, that issue is resolved.  One is
            enough for me, and I had it installed in the lower left so it did not interfere with
            distance view, and did not affect my predominant right eye, the one I put to the viewfinder.<br /><br />
            4.  Anti-fog - Even the best mask is horrible if you can't get it to clear. 
            Which is a fairly massive problem with many masks thee days.  The release agent
            used to pop the skirts off the mold in manufacture seems to stay on there forever,
            sloughing off at the most inopportune times to make the mask continually fog. 
            I've tried all the tricks ... softscrub, toothpaste, even using a lighter to burn
            the goop off the rubber and glass.  But, the only thing that absolutely/positively
            works for me is "500 psi" mask scrub.  It costs a buck and you can usually find
            it by the check out counter at you local dive store.  Once the mask is adequately
            scrubbed, and good mask-clear works wonders.  But, rinse thoroughly before putting
            on for the dive, because some of the mask clear solutions can irritate the eye.  
            <br /><p></p><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/W60E210.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/W60E214.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/W60E221.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/W60E230.jpg" border="0" /></div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/aggbug.ashx?id=66ae6e50-4dce-40a6-8222-5faf9d139381" />
      </body>
      <title>Shooter Mask</title>
      <guid>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,66ae6e50-4dce-40a6-8222-5faf9d139381.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/Shooter+Mask.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:31:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
   &lt;div&gt;
      &lt;div&gt;A diver's facemask is their window on the underwater world, but for a photographer
         it is even more important.&amp;nbsp; If you can't see it you can't shoot it.&amp;nbsp; To
         that end, there are a number of things I look for in a favorite shooter mask:&lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         1.&amp;nbsp; Black silicone skirt - this is the most important thing for me, and is the
         first parameter I consider.&amp;nbsp; Silicone because it is more comfortable than the
         old rubber masks of yesteryear, but black for the same reason Ansel Adams put a black
         focusing cloth over his head when working with his view camera outside in Yosemite.&amp;nbsp;
         There is a need to block extraneous light from the groundglass to optimize contrast
         and resolution, and black does so obviously far better than a clear skirted mask.&amp;nbsp;
         I like clear skirted masks for my models, because they are more attractive and easier
         to light, but for me, with my eye to a viewfinder on a housed D-SLR, black always.&lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         2.&amp;nbsp; High light-transmission glass - Some glass has higher miscellaneous mineral
         content than others and it can affect light transmission.&amp;nbsp; In fact, when I first
         got my Atomic Ultra-clear I shot a photo through that mask and my old shooter mask
         as a comparison, just to check out the meter readings with the only variable being
         type of glass in front of the camera lens.&amp;nbsp; I could actually deduce a significant
         difference in the histogram of the two shots, with the curve moving more to the right
         with the Atomic mask, empirically proving greater light transmission with the Ultraclear
         glass.&amp;nbsp; Better glass is brighter glass, and if more light passes through the
         mask, my underwater visual acuity is enhanced.&amp;nbsp; 
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         3.&amp;nbsp; Gauge reader - I wear reading glasses, but have perfect distance vision.&amp;nbsp;
         So, I can pick out any of the big stuff on the reef, but am challenged by the little
         reef minutia, pygmy seahorses and such.&amp;nbsp; But, the bigger issue was that I had
         a hard time reading all the digital menus and arcane pathways I had to navigate to
         change camera custom settings.&amp;nbsp; But, now that I use a ground gauge reader applied
         to the lower left corner of my shooter mask, that issue is resolved.&amp;nbsp; One is
         enough for me, and I had it installed in the lower left so it did not interfere with
         distance view, and did not affect my predominant right eye, the one I put to the viewfinder.&lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         4.&amp;nbsp; Anti-fog - Even the best mask is horrible if you can't get it to clear.&amp;nbsp;
         Which is a fairly massive problem with many masks thee days.&amp;nbsp; The release agent
         used to pop the skirts off the mold in manufacture seems to stay on there forever,
         sloughing off at the most inopportune times to make the mask continually fog.&amp;nbsp;
         I've tried all the tricks ... softscrub, toothpaste, even using a lighter to burn
         the goop off the rubber and glass.&amp;nbsp; But, the only thing that absolutely/positively
         works for me is "500 psi" mask scrub.&amp;nbsp; It costs a buck and you can usually find
         it by the check out counter at you local dive store.&amp;nbsp; Once the mask is adequately
         scrubbed, and good mask-clear works wonders.&amp;nbsp; But, rinse thoroughly before putting
         on for the dive, because some of the mask clear solutions can irritate the eye.&amp;nbsp; 
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;p&gt;
         &lt;/p&gt;
         &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/W60E210.jpg" border="0"&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/W60E214.jpg" border="0"&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/W60E221.jpg" border="0"&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;br&gt;
         &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/W60E230.jpg" border="0"&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;
   &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/aggbug.ashx?id=66ae6e50-4dce-40a6-8222-5faf9d139381" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,66ae6e50-4dce-40a6-8222-5faf9d139381.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/Trackback.aspx?guid=3d118f45-b681-4182-8ec7-806a9080ecf1</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,3d118f45-b681-4182-8ec7-806a9080ecf1.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Scuba Staff</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,3d118f45-b681-4182-8ec7-806a9080ecf1.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=3d118f45-b681-4182-8ec7-806a9080ecf1</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div>
                <br />
               It was the start of an 11-day trip, November 2008, on one of my photo tours, this
               time running from Ambon to Raja Ampat in the far reaches of Indonesia. Pretty remote
               regions, a fact I learned all too well Valentine’s Day of 2007 when the live-aboard
               dive boat we were on in the Misool region made a strategic error running at night
               and ran smack-dab into an island. The island won. The bowsprit on the wooden boat
               was pushed back into the mast, dislodging it and causing the base of the mast to smash
               through crew quarters. No one was hurt, amazingly really, but we arranged to be evacuated
               by Indonesian Search-and-Rescue to Sorong and then we flew back to Bali where we finished
               off our dive holiday. 
               <br /><br />
               It could have been a lot worse, but just being back in that part of the world left
               me feeling a little paranoid. So, when on the first day out a guest began to complain
               of possible cardiac symptoms after the very first dive, I began to consider where
               we were going, how primitive health care services were, all the things that could
               go wrong and how far we were from critical-care health services. We had a couple of
               doctors on board (also guests) and their collective concern made me decide to talk
               to the experts. From anywhere in the world, for any diving related emergency, my go-to
               guys are the Diver’s Alert Network. 
               <br /><br />
               The first thing I did was to pick up a sat phone and call DAN in Durham, North Carolina.
               It was two in the morning there, but the on-call physician Dan Nord (sorry to wake
               you Dan) talked to my guest, and then went the extra mile to seek out a cardiac consultation
               from his network of specialists. He called back in less than 20-minutes and we had
               reassurance that this was not a life-threatening cardiac event, and so long as he
               took it a little easy we could carry-on with the trip.<br /><br />
               That particular event, albeit rather inconsequential, reminded me how very important
               the DAN organization has become for the growth of global dive travel. A fact I know
               all too well from personal experience. 
               <br /><br />
               Divers Alert Network has bailed me out of jams several times in the past. The first
               time I got bent was in Vanuatu, back when Vanuatu was REALLY remote. There were no
               chambers there, and at the time there wasn’t even a decompression chamber in Fiji,
               the next stop along the way. There weren’t satellite phones then either, but through
               a combination of single-sideband radios back to a shore base and a long distance phone
               call to DAN headquarters, they decided the nearest deco treatment was in Hawaii. So,
               I boarded on the 747 I was scheduled to fly anyway, and Qantas dropped an O2 bib just
               for me. I sucked oxygen, watched movies, and stepped off our jetliner in Waikiki to
               be whisked away to the Navy’s recompression chamber for an 8-hour treatment. That
               was the first time I really got a glimpse of the efficient global network that DAN
               had become, and how absolutely integral they are to the growth of international dive
               travel. For without the DAN safety net, people could not afford to go to the places
               we go for fear of being bankrupted by the very real possibility that something, dive-related
               or not, could go wrong and they’d have to be evacuated. 
               <br /><br />
               That episode along cost DAN insurance providers over $50,000, and that was back in
               mid-eighties dollars. I can easily envision a $200,000 tab for evacuation and treatment
               these days, and without that kind of an upper limit on a personal credit card, there
               is the very real possibility the airplane and doctors and chambers would simply not
               be available if they weren’t certain they would be paid. That’s the power of deep
               pockets and serious insurance. That’s the power of DAN.<br /><br />
               So, I knew DAN from my own experiences, but later in the week, over a few post-dive
               beers, other DAN stories popped up. One guest had her brakes give out on her bicycle
               as she was racing down a steep incline. She fell off the bike, smashed into a tree,
               and had massive facial injuries. DAN to the rescue in terms of prompt evacuation.
               Her husband, also a DAN member, suffered a heart attack while on a cruise ship in
               Jamaica. He got off the ship in Cayman and was stabilized in the local hospital and
               then airlifted home. DAN to the rescue. It was interesting to me to note how broad
               the coverage was in these cases, even though not directly dive related accidents.
               Insurance and assistance for evacuation back to proper health care facilities is a
               big part of the DAN mission. 
               <br /><br />
               As further illustration, another bad accident happened to a close friend of mine on
               one of our trips to Thailand. He got hit by the hull and propeller of the dive dinghy,
               resulting in some very nasty contusions and deep lacerations to his foot. He had to
               get evacuated from the Myanmar border back to Phuket to be hospitalized, and following
               treatment needed assistance to get back home. Once more it was DAN to the rescue,
               although by then we had satellite phones and could talk to DAN directly (24/7 by the
               way). His issue had nothing to do with decompression sickness, but all to do with
               being in a remote region with serious need for medical care. DAN was there for him.
               By coincidence, that friend of mine, Dennis Liberson, is now Chairman of the Board
               of DAN, and I am proudly now a member of the board of directors as well. For us, it
               is a small way to give back to an organization that means so much to the global support
               of destination diving.<br /><br />
               For others who may ever have had need for emergency treatment, or even the reassurance
               of a free phone consultation far from home, the importance of DAN may not be readily
               apparent. But, of all the things we do as recreational divers, the small cost of DAN
               membership and insurance is the best bargain in our industry. Some may take it for
               granted, but not me. We require DAN insurance for all participants in our photo-tours,
               and most live-aboards worldwide want that same proof of recompression treatment and
               evacuation insurance for all their guests. Really, don’t leave home without it. Don’t
               even think about it. By the way, this year's trip was aboard the Seven Seas, and it
               was awesome. Great boat, and great crew, with diverse and spectacular photo opportunities.
               In the end we had nothing to worry about, nothing worth being insured for. That's
               the very best kind of insurance ... the kind you don't need. 
               <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><p></p><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/_WH_1496.jpg" border="0" /></div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/aggbug.ashx?id=3d118f45-b681-4182-8ec7-806a9080ecf1" />
      </body>
      <title>DAN to the Rescue (Again)</title>
      <guid>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,3d118f45-b681-4182-8ec7-806a9080ecf1.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/DAN+To+The+Rescue+Again.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:31:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
   &lt;div&gt;
      &lt;div&gt;
         &lt;div&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            It was the start of an 11-day trip, November 2008, on one of my photo tours, this
            time running from Ambon to Raja Ampat in the far reaches of Indonesia. Pretty remote
            regions, a fact I learned all too well Valentine’s Day of 2007 when the live-aboard
            dive boat we were on in the Misool region made a strategic error running at night
            and ran smack-dab into an island. The island won. The bowsprit on the wooden boat
            was pushed back into the mast, dislodging it and causing the base of the mast to smash
            through crew quarters. No one was hurt, amazingly really, but we arranged to be evacuated
            by Indonesian Search-and-Rescue to Sorong and then we flew back to Bali where we finished
            off our dive holiday. 
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            It could have been a lot worse, but just being back in that part of the world left
            me feeling a little paranoid. So, when on the first day out a guest began to complain
            of possible cardiac symptoms after the very first dive, I began to consider where
            we were going, how primitive health care services were, all the things that could
            go wrong and how far we were from critical-care health services. We had a couple of
            doctors on board (also guests) and their collective concern made me decide to talk
            to the experts. From anywhere in the world, for any diving related emergency, my go-to
            guys are the Diver’s Alert Network. 
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            The first thing I did was to pick up a sat phone and call DAN in Durham, North Carolina.
            It was two in the morning there, but the on-call physician Dan Nord (sorry to wake
            you Dan) talked to my guest, and then went the extra mile to seek out a cardiac consultation
            from his network of specialists. He called back in less than 20-minutes and we had
            reassurance that this was not a life-threatening cardiac event, and so long as he
            took it a little easy we could carry-on with the trip.&lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            That particular event, albeit rather inconsequential, reminded me how very important
            the DAN organization has become for the growth of global dive travel. A fact I know
            all too well from personal experience. 
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            Divers Alert Network has bailed me out of jams several times in the past. The first
            time I got bent was in Vanuatu, back when Vanuatu was REALLY remote. There were no
            chambers there, and at the time there wasn’t even a decompression chamber in Fiji,
            the next stop along the way. There weren’t satellite phones then either, but through
            a combination of single-sideband radios back to a shore base and a long distance phone
            call to DAN headquarters, they decided the nearest deco treatment was in Hawaii. So,
            I boarded on the 747 I was scheduled to fly anyway, and Qantas dropped an O2 bib just
            for me. I sucked oxygen, watched movies, and stepped off our jetliner in Waikiki to
            be whisked away to the Navy’s recompression chamber for an 8-hour treatment. That
            was the first time I really got a glimpse of the efficient global network that DAN
            had become, and how absolutely integral they are to the growth of international dive
            travel. For without the DAN safety net, people could not afford to go to the places
            we go for fear of being bankrupted by the very real possibility that something, dive-related
            or not, could go wrong and they’d have to be evacuated. 
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            That episode along cost DAN insurance providers over $50,000, and that was back in
            mid-eighties dollars. I can easily envision a $200,000 tab for evacuation and treatment
            these days, and without that kind of an upper limit on a personal credit card, there
            is the very real possibility the airplane and doctors and chambers would simply not
            be available if they weren’t certain they would be paid. That’s the power of deep
            pockets and serious insurance. That’s the power of DAN.&lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            So, I knew DAN from my own experiences, but later in the week, over a few post-dive
            beers, other DAN stories popped up. One guest had her brakes give out on her bicycle
            as she was racing down a steep incline. She fell off the bike, smashed into a tree,
            and had massive facial injuries. DAN to the rescue in terms of prompt evacuation.
            Her husband, also a DAN member, suffered a heart attack while on a cruise ship in
            Jamaica. He got off the ship in Cayman and was stabilized in the local hospital and
            then airlifted home. DAN to the rescue. It was interesting to me to note how broad
            the coverage was in these cases, even though not directly dive related accidents.
            Insurance and assistance for evacuation back to proper health care facilities is a
            big part of the DAN mission. 
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            As further illustration, another bad accident happened to a close friend of mine on
            one of our trips to Thailand. He got hit by the hull and propeller of the dive dinghy,
            resulting in some very nasty contusions and deep lacerations to his foot. He had to
            get evacuated from the Myanmar border back to Phuket to be hospitalized, and following
            treatment needed assistance to get back home. Once more it was DAN to the rescue,
            although by then we had satellite phones and could talk to DAN directly (24/7 by the
            way). His issue had nothing to do with decompression sickness, but all to do with
            being in a remote region with serious need for medical care. DAN was there for him.
            By coincidence, that friend of mine, Dennis Liberson, is now Chairman of the Board
            of DAN, and I am proudly now a member of the board of directors as well. For us, it
            is a small way to give back to an organization that means so much to the global support
            of destination diving.&lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            For others who may ever have had need for emergency treatment, or even the reassurance
            of a free phone consultation far from home, the importance of DAN may not be readily
            apparent. But, of all the things we do as recreational divers, the small cost of DAN
            membership and insurance is the best bargain in our industry. Some may take it for
            granted, but not me. We require DAN insurance for all participants in our photo-tours,
            and most live-aboards worldwide want that same proof of recompression treatment and
            evacuation insurance for all their guests. Really, don’t leave home without it. Don’t
            even think about it. By the way, this year's trip was aboard the Seven Seas, and it
            was awesome. Great boat, and great crew, with diverse and spectacular photo opportunities.
            In the end we had nothing to worry about, nothing worth being insured for. That's
            the very best kind of insurance ... the kind you don't need. 
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;p&gt;
            &lt;/p&gt;
            &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/_WH_1496.jpg" border="0"&gt;
         &lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;
   &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/aggbug.ashx?id=3d118f45-b681-4182-8ec7-806a9080ecf1" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,3d118f45-b681-4182-8ec7-806a9080ecf1.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/Trackback.aspx?guid=de614b0b-83d5-4c64-a47e-571e0de8c2ec</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,de614b0b-83d5-4c64-a47e-571e0de8c2ec.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Scuba Staff</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,de614b0b-83d5-4c64-a47e-571e0de8c2ec.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=de614b0b-83d5-4c64-a47e-571e0de8c2ec</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>There used to be 2 magic numbers in travel:  50 for domestic air and 70
      for international.  Those were the weight in pounds that one could check without
      incurring overweight charges.  We all know the formula is changing, but without
      checking the airline’s website it seems one can never predict from one trip to the
      next what rules apply.<br /><br />
      Case in point … my trip to Indonesia at the moment.  When I checked in at my
      US gateway, in this case Las Vegas, with a bag full of camera gear at 67 pounds and
      a clothing/dive gear combo at 70 pounds, I assumed I would be OK.  Not! 
      If it was a US destination and I was flying American, for example, I would now expect
      to pay $15 for the first bag + $50 since it was 50-70 pounds + $25 for the second
      bag + $50 since it was 50-70 pounds.  $65 for the first bag and $75 for the second
      bag = $140.  Not perfect, but a new reality I can accept.  After all, diving
      and underwater photography are heavy past-times and I expect to pay.<br /><br />
      But, here was the new and quite unpleasant new parameter.  American, or any US
      carrier, has to play by the rules of the international carrier they connect to. 
      In this case Singapore Air, and Singapore Air expected to be paid 3 times the overweight
      charge for the 50-70 pound limit PER BAG.  $150 per bag in overweight x 2 bags. 
      $600 in overweight each way.  $1200 in overweight just getting to and from Bali,
      let alone whatever I was likely to incur in overweight with the domestic carriers
      within Indonesia.  Probably $1500 in overweight to get to Raja Ampat.  Yikes!!! 
      This is getting a bit silly.<br /><br />
      However, I lucked out with a helpful ticket agent at the American counter, and she
      told me it was cheaper to pay for a third bag if I could get them all under 50 pounds. 
      So, I raced to a nearby shop at the airport and bought a particularly ugly $50 suitcase
      patterned like a giraffe.  I redistributed the weight between the 3 bags, and
      now each was less than 50 pounds, yielding new math that worked out to be $109. I
      can’t tell you what the formula was that she used to come up with that, but I wasn’t
      arguing!  <br /><br />
      The new magic number appears to be 50, whether for international or domestic.  
      Hopefully, armed with that knowledge I can make the next trip with 2 bags at 50 pounds
      each, but if not possible, it is nice to know the better option is a third bag. 
      Well, at least for now, until they change the rules again. 
      <br /><br /><p></p><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/baggage_2.jpg" border="0" /></div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/aggbug.ashx?id=de614b0b-83d5-4c64-a47e-571e0de8c2ec" />
      </body>
      <title>Travel Tribulations - How to get 140 pounds of checked baggage to Indonesia</title>
      <guid>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,de614b0b-83d5-4c64-a47e-571e0de8c2ec.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/Travel+Tribulations++How+To+Get+140+Pounds+Of+Checked+Baggage+To+Indonesia.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:52:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;There used to be 2 magic numbers in travel:&amp;nbsp; 50 for domestic air and 70
   for international.&amp;nbsp; Those were the weight in pounds that one could check without
   incurring overweight charges.&amp;nbsp; We all know the formula is changing, but without
   checking the airline’s website it seems one can never predict from one trip to the
   next what rules apply.&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   Case in point … my trip to Indonesia at the moment.&amp;nbsp; When I checked in at my
   US gateway, in this case Las Vegas, with a bag full of camera gear at 67 pounds and
   a clothing/dive gear combo at 70 pounds, I assumed I would be OK.&amp;nbsp; Not!&amp;nbsp;
   If it was a US destination and I was flying American, for example, I would now expect
   to pay $15 for the first bag + $50 since it was 50-70 pounds + $25 for the second
   bag + $50 since it was 50-70 pounds.&amp;nbsp; $65 for the first bag and $75 for the second
   bag = $140.&amp;nbsp; Not perfect, but a new reality I can accept.&amp;nbsp; After all, diving
   and underwater photography are heavy past-times and I expect to pay.&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   But, here was the new and quite unpleasant new parameter.&amp;nbsp; American, or any US
   carrier, has to play by the rules of the international carrier they connect to.&amp;nbsp;
   In this case Singapore Air, and Singapore Air expected to be paid 3 times the overweight
   charge for the 50-70 pound limit PER BAG.&amp;nbsp; $150 per bag in overweight x 2 bags.&amp;nbsp;
   $600 in overweight each way.&amp;nbsp; $1200 in overweight just getting to and from Bali,
   let alone whatever I was likely to incur in overweight with the domestic carriers
   within Indonesia.&amp;nbsp; Probably $1500 in overweight to get to Raja Ampat.&amp;nbsp; Yikes!!!&amp;nbsp;
   This is getting a bit silly.&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   However, I lucked out with a helpful ticket agent at the American counter, and she
   told me it was cheaper to pay for a third bag if I could get them all under 50 pounds.&amp;nbsp;
   So, I raced to a nearby shop at the airport and bought a particularly ugly $50 suitcase
   patterned like a giraffe.&amp;nbsp; I redistributed the weight between the 3 bags, and
   now each was less than 50 pounds, yielding new math that worked out to be $109. I
   can’t tell you what the formula was that she used to come up with that, but I wasn’t
   arguing! &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   The new magic number appears to be 50, whether for international or domestic.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
   Hopefully, armed with that knowledge I can make the next trip with 2 bags at 50 pounds
   each, but if not possible, it is nice to know the better option is a third bag.&amp;nbsp;
   Well, at least for now, until they change the rules again. 
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;p&gt;
   &lt;/p&gt;
   &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/baggage_2.jpg" border="0"&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/aggbug.ashx?id=de614b0b-83d5-4c64-a47e-571e0de8c2ec" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,de614b0b-83d5-4c64-a47e-571e0de8c2ec.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/Trackback.aspx?guid=84e830ad-1432-48df-9fc9-c54c44e39a4a</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,84e830ad-1432-48df-9fc9-c54c44e39a4a.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Scuba Staff</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,84e830ad-1432-48df-9fc9-c54c44e39a4a.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=84e830ad-1432-48df-9fc9-c54c44e39a4a</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>Today at the DEMA show I had a chance to talk to John Ellerbrock about the new
      Gates housing for the RED video camera.  The RED is an almost mythical camera
      that will push the envelope of high definition video far beyond anything available
      previously in the digital realm.  See http://www.red.com, or in their words: <i>"Typical
      high-end HD camcorders have 2.1M pixel sensors and record with 3:1:1 color sub-sampled
      video at up to 30fps. RED offers the Mysterium ™ Super 35mm cine sized (24.4×13.7mm)
      sensor, which provides 4K (up to 30 fps), 3K (up to 60 fps) and 2K (up to 120 fps)
      capture, and all this with wide dynamic range and color space in 12 bit native RAW.
      At 4K, that’s more than 5 times the amount of information available every second and
      a vastly superior recording quality.</i>"<br /><br />
      But, for an underwater shooter, what good is the very best camera without a stellar
      housing, and that's what the Gates team has achieved. Working in close collaboration
      with IMAX film-maker Howard Hall, John Ellerbrock of Gates has created some breakthough
      innovations in housing design, including using the reverse polarity of magnets to
      actually operate mechanical controls without the necessity of through-housing shafts,
      and a unique toggle shaft for the housing that is a clever solution to what must have
      been a very challenging (but crucial) camera control.   
      <br /><br />
      I'm not a videographer, but I do appreciate brilliance in mechanical design and machining
      excellence.  Very nicely done!<br /><p></p><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Frink_Gates-1.jpg" border="0" /></div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/aggbug.ashx?id=84e830ad-1432-48df-9fc9-c54c44e39a4a" />
      </body>
      <title>Gates Housing for RED video</title>
      <guid>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,84e830ad-1432-48df-9fc9-c54c44e39a4a.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/Gates+Housing+For+RED+Video.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 05:58:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;Today at the DEMA show I had a chance to talk to John Ellerbrock about the new
   Gates housing for the RED video camera.&amp;nbsp; The RED is an almost mythical camera
   that will push the envelope of high definition video far beyond anything available
   previously in the digital realm.&amp;nbsp; See http://www.red.com, or in their words: &lt;i&gt;"Typical
   high-end HD camcorders have 2.1M pixel sensors and record with 3:1:1 color sub-sampled
   video at up to 30fps. RED offers the Mysterium ™ Super 35mm cine sized (24.4×13.7mm)
   sensor, which provides 4K (up to 30 fps), 3K (up to 60 fps) and 2K (up to 120 fps)
   capture, and all this with wide dynamic range and color space in 12 bit native RAW.
   At 4K, that’s more than 5 times the amount of information available every second and
   a vastly superior recording quality.&lt;/i&gt;"&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   But, for an underwater shooter, what good is the very best camera without a stellar
   housing, and that's what the Gates team has achieved. Working in close collaboration
   with IMAX film-maker Howard Hall, John Ellerbrock of Gates has created some breakthough
   innovations in housing design, including using the reverse polarity of magnets to
   actually operate mechanical controls without the necessity of through-housing shafts,
   and a unique toggle shaft for the housing that is a clever solution to what must have
   been a very challenging (but crucial) camera control. &amp;nbsp; 
   &lt;br&gt;
   &lt;br&gt;
   I'm not a videographer, but I do appreciate brilliance in mechanical design and machining
   excellence.&amp;nbsp; Very nicely done!&lt;br&gt;
   &lt;p&gt;
   &lt;/p&gt;
   &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Frink_Gates-1.jpg" border="0"&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/aggbug.ashx?id=84e830ad-1432-48df-9fc9-c54c44e39a4a" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,84e830ad-1432-48df-9fc9-c54c44e39a4a.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/Trackback.aspx?guid=774abbd5-ad81-4d93-ba89-5f3c7799c300</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,774abbd5-ad81-4d93-ba89-5f3c7799c300.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Scuba Staff</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,774abbd5-ad81-4d93-ba89-5f3c7799c300.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=774abbd5-ad81-4d93-ba89-5f3c7799c300</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div>As I walk around the floor of the DEMA show I see several of my photos that have
               been used in displays and ad campaigns. That's a good thing ... I love to be part
               of some art director's creative vision in promoting a dive destinations or a live-aboard
               or a bit of dive gear.  But, it also reminds me of how easy the whole process
               has become.<br /><br />
               The shot of the dolphin used on the Bay Islands banner was shot as a slide, then a
               duplicate transparency was sent to the ad agency for review.  Once the decision
               was made they called for the original slide, which was then Fed Exed to the production
               house, scanned, and printed.  All told, the slide was gone for a couple of weeks
               and two Fed Exes necessary to get the slide to the client and then back home.<br /><br />
               By contrast, the shots for Henderson were shot this summer on a Canon 1DSMKIII (21MP)
               in the Red Sea.  I sent some thumbnail JPGs to Joe Polak at Henderson so he could
               see how this new H2 suits looked in the water.  In anticipation of the DEMA show
               he called for 2 files (by file number), I processed as high res TIF and uploaded via
               FTP (lots of acronyms in this new workflow).  No originals floating around by
               courier, no chance they would be lost or damaged.  Quick and efficient.  
               <br /><br />
               And truthfully, the quality on these new digital files is SO very much better than
               my old slides.  Seeing the Henderson wetsuits blown up to the size they are in
               real-life, and reading the detail in the logo is a testament to the incredible image
               quality these new cameras deliver.<br /><p></p><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/roatan.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Henderson_1.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Henderson_2.jpg" border="0" /></div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/aggbug.ashx?id=774abbd5-ad81-4d93-ba89-5f3c7799c300" />
      </body>
      <title>Loving those high-res files!</title>
      <guid>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,774abbd5-ad81-4d93-ba89-5f3c7799c300.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/Loving+Those+Highres+Files.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:03:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
   &lt;div&gt;
      &lt;div&gt;
         &lt;div&gt;As I walk around the floor of the DEMA show I see several of my photos that have
            been used in displays and ad campaigns. That's a good thing ... I love to be part
            of some art director's creative vision in promoting a dive destinations or a live-aboard
            or a bit of dive gear.&amp;nbsp; But, it also reminds me of how easy the whole process
            has become.&lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            The shot of the dolphin used on the Bay Islands banner was shot as a slide, then a
            duplicate transparency was sent to the ad agency for review.&amp;nbsp; Once the decision
            was made they called for the original slide, which was then Fed Exed to the production
            house, scanned, and printed.&amp;nbsp; All told, the slide was gone for a couple of weeks
            and two Fed Exes necessary to get the slide to the client and then back home.&lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            By contrast, the shots for Henderson were shot this summer on a Canon 1DSMKIII (21MP)
            in the Red Sea.&amp;nbsp; I sent some thumbnail JPGs to Joe Polak at Henderson so he could
            see how this new H2 suits looked in the water.&amp;nbsp; In anticipation of the DEMA show
            he called for 2 files (by file number), I processed as high res TIF and uploaded via
            FTP (lots of acronyms in this new workflow).&amp;nbsp; No originals floating around by
            courier, no chance they would be lost or damaged.&amp;nbsp; Quick and efficient.&amp;nbsp; 
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            And truthfully, the quality on these new digital files is SO very much better than
            my old slides.&amp;nbsp; Seeing the Henderson wetsuits blown up to the size they are in
            real-life, and reading the detail in the logo is a testament to the incredible image
            quality these new cameras deliver.&lt;br&gt;
            &lt;p&gt;
            &lt;/p&gt;
            &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/roatan.jpg" border="0"&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Henderson_1.jpg" border="0"&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;br&gt;
            &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Henderson_2.jpg" border="0"&gt;
         &lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;
   &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/aggbug.ashx?id=774abbd5-ad81-4d93-ba89-5f3c7799c300" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,774abbd5-ad81-4d93-ba89-5f3c7799c300.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/Trackback.aspx?guid=f4e6771c-b759-4d6c-9944-2bd74202c2d8</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,f4e6771c-b759-4d6c-9944-2bd74202c2d8.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Scuba Staff</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,f4e6771c-b759-4d6c-9944-2bd74202c2d8.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=f4e6771c-b759-4d6c-9944-2bd74202c2d8</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <div>I'm at the DEMA (Dive Equipment Manufacturers Association) show in Las Vegas
         this week, and then off to Indonesia from here, Ambon to Raja Ampat on the Seven Seas.
         Anyway, we are exhibiting the Seacam line as I am North and South American distributor
         for this line of digital SLR housings made in Austria (among myriad other things to
         do at the DEMA show).<br /><br />
         The manufacturer, Harald Hordosch showed us some pretty significant surprises on the
         housing for the Nikon D3. There is a new port to accommodate the 14-24 Nikkor zoom
         lens and the latching system is brand new, and will replace conventional latches and
         registration pins for all housings moving forward. Other new things included a special
         handle part of the polecam that integrates a means to hook up cyberglasses independent
         of the remote monitor, Seaflash 150 strobe for both Nikon and Canon TTL (along with
         a diffuser for same)<br /><br />
         One bit of big news was that Chuckie Luzier from Canon was there at our booth showing
         a lot of Canon product, but the one everyone migrated to was the 5DMKII. There are
         only 20 of these in the US at the moment, so getting one at DEMA was a huge coup,
         especially since Photo Expo is going on in New York at this exact same time. 
         This camera not only shoots 21 PM still images, but integrates at high definition
         video capability.<br /><br />
         Some video guy covering the show and schlepping a rolling cart-full of video gear
         picked up the camera and walked around the booth doing video kind of stuff ... he
         was blown away. I'm not a video person (not yet anyway, but with the convergence of
         stills and video in the new cameras I expect to learn) but Chuckie made the logical
         statement that the guy's imager was 3/4", while the 5DMII imager is 1.5 inches. That
         seemed to particularly resonate and he was obviously quite impressed with the output. 
         <br /><br />
         Seacam, and presumably all other high end housing manufacturers, will obviously do
         a 5DMKII housing, probably first quarter 2009.<br /><br />
         But, not all DEMA is work of course, and here I am with my friends from Scuba Diving
         Magazine, obviously having a very important business meeting ;)<br /><br />
         More from DEMA coming soon.<br /><br /><p></p><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Chuckie_DEMA.jpg" border="0" /><br /><br /><img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/staff.jpg" border="0" /></div>
        </div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/aggbug.ashx?id=f4e6771c-b759-4d6c-9944-2bd74202c2d8" />
      </body>
      <title>Random thoughts from DEMA</title>
      <guid>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,f4e6771c-b759-4d6c-9944-2bd74202c2d8.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/Random+Thoughts+From+DEMA.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:29:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;
   &lt;div&gt;I'm at the DEMA (Dive Equipment Manufacturers Association) show in Las Vegas
      this week, and then off to Indonesia from here, Ambon to Raja Ampat on the Seven Seas.
      Anyway, we are exhibiting the Seacam line as I am North and South American distributor
      for this line of digital SLR housings made in Austria (among myriad other things to
      do at the DEMA show).&lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      The manufacturer, Harald Hordosch showed us some pretty significant surprises on the
      housing for the Nikon D3. There is a new port to accommodate the 14-24 Nikkor zoom
      lens and the latching system is brand new, and will replace conventional latches and
      registration pins for all housings moving forward. Other new things included a special
      handle part of the polecam that integrates a means to hook up cyberglasses independent
      of the remote monitor, Seaflash 150 strobe for both Nikon and Canon TTL (along with
      a diffuser for same)&lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      One bit of big news was that Chuckie Luzier from Canon was there at our booth showing
      a lot of Canon product, but the one everyone migrated to was the 5DMKII. There are
      only 20 of these in the US at the moment, so getting one at DEMA was a huge coup,
      especially since Photo Expo is going on in New York at this exact same time.&amp;nbsp;
      This camera not only shoots 21 PM still images, but integrates at high definition
      video capability.&lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      Some video guy covering the show and schlepping a rolling cart-full of video gear
      picked up the camera and walked around the booth doing video kind of stuff ... he
      was blown away. I'm not a video person (not yet anyway, but with the convergence of
      stills and video in the new cameras I expect to learn) but Chuckie made the logical
      statement that the guy's imager was 3/4", while the 5DMII imager is 1.5 inches. That
      seemed to particularly resonate and he was obviously quite impressed with the output. 
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      Seacam, and presumably all other high end housing manufacturers, will obviously do
      a 5DMKII housing, probably first quarter 2009.&lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      But, not all DEMA is work of course, and here I am with my friends from Scuba Diving
      Magazine, obviously having a very important business meeting ;)&lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      More from DEMA coming soon.&lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;p&gt;
      &lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/Chuckie_DEMA.jpg" border="0"&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;br&gt;
      &lt;img src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/content/binary/staff.jpg" border="0"&gt;
   &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/aggbug.ashx?id=f4e6771c-b759-4d6c-9944-2bd74202c2d8" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,f4e6771c-b759-4d6c-9944-2bd74202c2d8.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/Trackback.aspx?guid=f30714cc-468c-4c84-881e-2c75197245aa</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/PermaLink,guid,f30714cc-468c-4c84-881e-2c75197245aa.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Scuba Staff</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/CommentView,guid,f30714cc-468c-4c84-881e-2c75197245aa.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.scubadiving.com/stephenfrink/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=f30714cc-468c-4c84-881e-2c75197245aa</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div>
          <br />
      Last year I was working on a project, creating huge murals for a new Visitor Center
      being built in Key West for the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary.  It involves
      shooting specific habitats, some topside (Ft. Jefferson, as well as Pinelands and
      Wetlands in the Lower Keys) and specific underwater topography to include bank reefs,
      patch reefs, hard bottom, and a historical shipwreck (the Civil War Wreck off the
      Elbow).  Saturday was my day to shoot the Patch Reef, and my friends at Quiescence
      recommended a site in behind Molasses that they dive quite often called “Brody’s”.<br /><br />
      Now, I’ve lived in Key Largo since 1978, and it is hard to imagine a site that’s good
      for photography has escaped me.  But, I’d never dived this one.  I was diving
      with John Halas, manager for the Key Largo region of the Sanctuary, and one who actually
      predates me in the dive industry here in Key Largo.  John agreed this was the
      best of the best for local Patch Reef habitat.  So based on his stellar recommendation, 
      Brody’s was our destination.<br /><br />
      From the surface I could see the circular sand halo surrounding a more or less circular
      reef, maybe a little longer than the length of a football field.  That is part
      of the classic definition of “patch” reef … so far so good.  But, dropping beneath
      the surface I was amazed at how pristine the hard corals and gorgonia were. 
      The schools of fish were impressive, especially near the south end of the reef where
      the prevailing current built up large filter feeding sponge and gorgonia.  Here
      was a large congregate of Atlantic spadefish, as well as mangrove snapper, hogfish,
      porkfish, and of course the omnipresent grunts that so define Keys diving.<br /><br />
      I spent 65 minutes no deeper than 28 feet, on this my first dive at Brody’s, and then
      only came up b